At first glance, the recent protests in Amsterdam against the provocative presence of supporters of football club Maccabi Tel Aviv (chant: ‘There are no schools in Gaza because there are no children left’) are a hopeful sign. For a start, Israel is not part of Europe at all and has no business in European competitions, be it the Champions League or the Eurovision Song Contest or whatever. It might also not be a bad idea to basically boycott a genocidal apartheid system. But above all, the media could not ignore the fact (football, you know) that there is protest from the people, at a time when governments are en masse turning a blind eye to the genocide in Palestina, and solidarity with the Palestinian people is brutally oppressed (sad low point, of course: Germany). Well, there do remain some small opportunities for individual solidarity.
Since Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza, also the United Nations should consider suspending Israel’s membership of the international community. These were the words of Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, on 31 October 2024 before a UN committee in New York. The committee discussed her latest report, which concludes that ‘the violence that Israel has unleashed against the Palestinians post-7 October [2023] is not happening in a vacuum, but is part of a long-term intentional, systematic, State-organized forced displacement and replacement of the Palestinians. This trajectory risks causing irreparable prejudice to the very existence of the Palestinian people in Palestine.’
In her report, Albanese documents systematic acts that constitute genocide under the terms of the UN Genocide Convention. The treatment of Palestinians, as well as statements made by Israeli politicians and military officials, suggest a specific intent to systematically destroy the Palestinian people. That is a defining feature of genocide. According to the report, there is also a concerted campaign to wipe out the Palestinian presence in Gaza and the West Bank through forced expulsion, destruction of and targeted attacks on civilians. And while ‘the wholesale destruction of Gaza continues unabated, other parts of the land have not been spared’, Albanese wrote, referring to the violence of the Israeli state and the settlers in the West Bank as well. Therefore, ‘member States must intervene now to prevent new atrocities that will further scar human history’.
Francesca Albanese’s report is called Genocide as Colonial Erasure, and in a highly readable interview with the US magazine Democracy Now, she points out the central significance of the aspect of colonialism that manifests itself in the ‘process of annexation and racial segregation and apartheid’. The oppression of the Palestinians, she says, shows ‘the features of settler colonialism, the taking of the land, the taking of the resources, displacing the local population and replacing it.’ The systematic actions of the Israeli state are meant to ‘erase Palestinianness’. Albanese emphasises the need for global intervention to prevent further human rights violations, protect the rights of Palestinians and hold perpetrators accountable, and also that recognising that genocide is taking place in Gaza is crucial if it is to be stopped.
Rabbi Jay Michaelson is a contributing columnist for the Forward (Jewish. Independent. Nonprofit.) On 15 May 2024 he publishes a column, titled ‘The Gaza War is neither a genocide nor a mission – it’s Revisionist Zionism in action’. The opening line is promising: ‘As the Gaza war drags into its eighth bloody month, opinions have hardened as to what it’s all about. And most of them are wrong.’ (Although Michaelson recognises that a bloodbath has been going on for eight months, he still talks about a war – as if it were a battle between two more or less equal armies and not the ruthless bombing and destruction of an entire society.)
The first opinion Michaelson wants to refute is that the massacre of the Palestinian population might be a genocide. He writes: ‘… genocide does not mean “an intensely horrible event in which one group kills many people in another group.” It means, under international law, lethal actions taken with “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.”’ Michaelson points to former prosecuted or at least recognized genocides such as the Holocaust, Rwanda, Bosnia, Cambodia, the Rohingya in Myanmar, Darfur in the period 2003-2005 (and again going on today), the ‘controversial’ Armenian genocide (also still going on in Azerbaijan) – and one might add the extermination of the Herrero and Nama in German South-West-Africa or the actual ongoing attempts by the Turkish authorities to eradicate Kurdish presence and culture in Turkey and the north of Syria and Iraq.
And, writes he: ‘In all of these cases, there was not merely horrible carnage (as there has been in Gaza); there was also a clear intent to destroy the targeted group, and policies that carried it out. Significant portions of each population were either murdered or permanently expelled.
This is not present in Gaza. The deaths of 35,000 people (or 25,000, excluding Hamas fighters) is an appalling tragedy, but that number reflects only 1.5% of the total population and is commensurate with civilian death rates in other conflicts. Israel has frequently warned populations to get out of the way of pending attacks, and (inadequately) allowed humanitarian relief to be distributed. And while some extremist members of the Israeli government have indeed made genocidal statements, official government policy shows no “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.” On the contrary, plans have already begun for the rebuilding of Gaza (bitterly opposed by Israel’s genocidal far right) after the war is finally over.’
I don’t know if rabbi Michaelson was being cynical in May 2024, but today, six months later, what he wrote then is by now extremely cynical. You all know about the death figures (around 45,000 – and why exclude resistance fighters, aren’t they Palestinian casualties too?) and several prognoses mention in the medium term 125,000 to 155,000 deaths due to the famine Israel deliberately organizes in Gaza. Israel has frequently warned populations, yes – only to bomb then the camps, the schools, the hospitals, the ‘safe zones’ the people were directed to.
A Cartography of Genocide is the title of a recent publication by the research group Forensic Architecture of Goldsmiths College at the University of London. Since October of last year, the project has been collecting data on attacks by the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) in Gaza. Together with an 827-page report, Forensic Architecture produced an interactive map of the coastal strip. It illustrates the full extent of the expulsion and of the destruction of civilian infrastructure and it provides evidence of a coordinated plan to wipe out the Palestinians in Gaza. The group speaks of genocide.
‘The patterns we have observed concerning Israel’s military conduct in Gaza indicate a systematic and organised campaign to destroy life, conditions necessary for life, and life-sustaining infrastructure’, the project page reads. To make the patterns in Israeli warfare visible, thousands of data points have been added to the graphic, which users can filter thematically. These patterns demonstrate that, in contrast to the official Israeli narrative that the ongoing war is about eliminating Hamas, the aim is to cause ‘maximum damage’. And this goal has been achieved.
In the first three weeks after 7 October 2023 alone, researchers recorded more than 1,000 Israeli bombardments, in which a total of an estimated 25,000 tonnes of explosives were used. After the Israeli ground offensive in Gaza began at the end of October, researchers recorded an even faster rate of destruction: 425 schools, 273 religious buildings, 250 shelters and the road network were repeatedly attacked by the IOF. The project also documents systematic attacks on clinics and other medical facilities, as well as on humanitarian aid deliveries. These figures are confirmed by the report presented in October 2024 by UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese.
The destruction of 70 percent of agricultural land and 45 percent of greenhouses prevents the supply of food from Gaza itself. The inhabitants are therefore increasingly dependent on Israeli-controlled deliveries from the outside. One conclusion of Forensic Architecture is that the occupying power is strategically provoking a famine in Gaza. This matches other reports that warned at the beginning of the year that, especially for children in Gaza, hunger and disease left little chance of survival.
Forensic Architecture has also analysed Israel’s military control over Gaza. The creation of zones such as the Netzarim Corridor, which divides Gaza in half and is lined with checkpoints, the Philadelphi Corridor on the border with Egypt, or roads for the army, point to a long-planned occupation of Gaza, according to the findings.
The data on flight movements in Gaza show that 90 percent of the population are now internally displaced. In a large part of the coastal strip, the Israeli Occupation Forces issued evacuation orders to the people there. They were forced to flee to supposedly safe humanitarian zones, but as the researchers show, many of these were also attacked.
Meanwhile, the situation in Gaza and the occupied West Bank continues to worsen. On 28 October 2024 , the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, decided that the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) will from 2025 no longer be allowed to operate in the occupied Palestinian territories. According to media reports, Israel wants to confiscate the land on which the UNRWA office in occupied East Jerusalem stands and build housing for settlers on it. The distribution of aid in Gaza is to fall within the jurisdiction of the IOF – the very same army whose soldiers have been filmed taunting and torturing Palestinians.
Near the end of the second act of Giuseppe Verdi’s opera ‘Don Carlos’, Rodrigo, marquis of Posa, has returned from Flanders. The entire region is terrorised by the Spanish occupation armies, and all resistance is brutally repressed without any distinction between resistance fighters and civilians. In the original, French version, Rodrigo implores his monarch, Philip II (1527 – 1598):
O Roi! J’arrive de Flandre, Ce pays jadis si beau ! Ce n’est plus qu’un désert de cendre, Un lieu d’horreur, un tombeau ! Là, l’orphelin qui mendie Et pleure sur les chemins, Tombe, en fuyant l’incendie Sur des ossements humains ! Le sang rougit l’eau des fleuves, Ils roulent, de morts chargés … L’air est plein des cris des veuves Sur leurs époux égorgés ! … Ah ! la main de Dieu soit bénie, Qui fait entendre par moi Le glas de cette agonie À la justice du Roi !
But Philip is adamant ; his reaction is the arrogance of power:
J’ai de ce prix sanglant payé la paix du monde : Ma foudre a terrassé l’orgueil des novateurs Qui vont, plongeant le peuple en des rêves menteurs … La mort, entre mes mains, peut devenir féconde.
The other opinion ‘as to what it’s all about’, that is wrong according to Jay Michaelson, is the Israeli narrative about self-defence. ‘Even if eradicating Hamas is an articulable goal — and even if it should be prioritized above the return of hostages, for which millions of Israelis have protested — the massive scope of the war belies that it is the only, or even the primary, one.’
What is then the main scope? That lies within the ideology of revisionist Zionism. This ideology dates from the beginning of the twentieth century, and an important feature was the assumption that it would be impossible to share the land and the resources of Palestina with the Arab population already living there: ‘Either we have to stop our Zionist colonization project altogether or we continue without caring whether the Arabs agree with it.’ Michaelson writes: ‘The Arabs will never accept us, revisionists said, and we must take the land by force. In a 1998 interview with the New Yorker, Benzion Netanyahu [the actual Prime Minister’s father] said that the Arabs “would end Jewish existence in the country if they had the chance to do it. Only the fear of retaliation keeps them back.”
This is the justification of the Gaza War. (…) This is what explains Israel’s “shock and awe” tactics. The scenes of carnage are intentional. They are meant to teach the world a lesson: Attack us, and you will pay dearly. (…)
But just as the war isn’t genocide, neither is it a purely military campaign. The brutality is part of the point; Israel is teaching its enemies a lesson.’
Rabbi Michaelson’s analysis is sort of confirmed by the Albanese report and by the Forensic Architecture research which show the reality of settler colonialism, apartheid, mass murder and genocide. Yes, the brutality is part of the point, and Israel is (with the active help of the USA, Germany and other Western governments) demonstrating its power and establishing a strip of burnt earth around Palestina, and it is doing so by committing massacre and genocide. So, if this is Revisionist Zionism in action, as rabbi Jay Michaelson says, it’s proof again that Revisionist Zionism, which is Israeli doctrine, is a genocidal ideology.
En savoir plus sur rivieren & meren - rivières & lacs - rivers & lakes
Abonnez-vous pour recevoir les derniers articles par e-mail.
rivieren & meren - rivières & lacs - rivers & lakes 
[…] Francesca Albanese: […]
J’aimeJ’aime
Why Jews view the Xtian church as the worst Av Tuma Nazi like avoda zarah?
The vision of Torah as an oath-based, constitutional brit alliance cut between the chosen Cohen people who alone accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, whose revelation centers upon judicial justice and prophetic mussar—not theological creeds or divine incarnations or false messiah Son of God theological creeds. Silly Xtian, even by the exceptionally low standards of your sophomoric bible translations Proverbs 1:33 says: “But whoso hearkeneth unto me shall dwell safely, and shall be quiet from fear of evil.” (KJV); this lone verse, its contained within the larger sugya of 1:20-2:22.
Shlomo rebukes his son for refusal to pursue Oral Torah wisdom. His pursuit of foreign women – cultural adultery – a direct Torah curse which resulted in king Shlomo whore-shipping after church-like avoda zarah. Silly Xtian, even by the exceptionally low standards of your sophomoric bible translations Proverbs 1:33 says: “But whoso hearkeneth unto me shall dwell safely, and shall be quiet from fear of evil.” (KJV). You silly reactionary Goyim have no wisdom. Goyim, they remind me how water behaves on a hot skillet! Ya ball up, bounce around, and make noise.
Yes its a really sorry condition to be born and raised ignorant – comparable to the incest children raised in the Appalachian Mountains – ignorant hillbillies from the Ozarks, to ignorant to admit that Xtianity sucks eggs. T’NaCH common law learns through precedents. Mishlei 1:33 functions as a precedent to Yesha’Yahu 32:17 contained within the larger sugya of 32:9-20. Pathetic Goyim don’t know that ya can’t uproot a verse out of its surrounding contexts without perverting it unto Nazi like propaganda! T’NaCH — a common law legal system. But you Appalachians don’t know this basic fact, because your church denies the existence of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev. Truly sucks being as ignorant as sticks.
Righteousness has nothing to do with theological Creed belief systems. The new-testament promotes JeZeus as the messiah Son of God – bull shit. Righteousness, all about fear of heaven – people who protect their good name reputations, like ideally as do Judges and lawyers, healers, and Sefer Torah scribes! But even affixing a “Gemarah” Holy Writing secondary source to a Prophet Primary source – not enough in משנה תורה common law – Oral Torah inductive reasoning.
A scholar, with fear of heaven, learns that Prophet source, to some other Prophetic precedent, then back to the Book of D’varim, and ideally even back to the Book of בראשית, which introduces Av tohor time oriented commandments, which require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna. Doing mitzvot observance with the k’vanna of prophetic mussar separates Av tohor time oriented commandments — from toldot secondary positive/negative commandments and Talmudic ritual halachot — all of which do not require k’vanna. However,,,, if a person weaves prophetic mussar as the weft thread of the warp threads of positive, negative, and Talmudic ritual halachah למעשה, this Torah wisdom elevates them all to Av tohor time oriented commandments from the Torah. This Av Torah commandment creates the chosen Cohen people from nothing in all generations Israel walks upon the face of the Earth.
Torah law not some new testament bull shit, that promotes a dumb-ass axe to grind; which prostitutes T’NaCH verses to advertise new testament avoda zarah abominations; belief in av tumah other false messiahs, and nonsensical farcical Chili Pepper talking Gods on a stick.
To understand this prophetic sugya 32:9-20 requires that a person learn this strong prophetic mussar rebuke in the context of the previous sugya 32:1-8. Through the wisdom of Oral Torah Pardes inductive logic reasoning, a close precedent which permits a person to read this same idea viewed from, a fresh and completely different perspective: 5:1-6 of the same prophet. Torah holds tremendous depths, like a diamond has tens of thousands of facet faces! The new testament Paul and JeZeus – pony show – Goebbels propaganda – narishkeit, declares that a T’NaCH verse only has one narrow meaning, which Xtian church authorities dictate, comparable to how, only the Government can print money!
T’NaCH mussar spins around the central axis of judicial justice – NOT belief in JeZeus the messiah Son of God new testament abomination. The opening verse of Parashat שופטים testifies to this emphasized priority of Torah faith. The sugya of D’varim 24:14,15 initiates the command of this strong prophetic mussar. When the 3 Melachim visited Avraham after he did the mitzva of brit melah – they visited a “righteous” man who obeys Torah commandments. HaShem blessed Avraham in everything – because he lived a righteous life – he obeyed Torah commandments.
Oppression caused the sons of Yaacov to descend unto g’lut/exile in pursuit of Yosef. The wicked do not call upon HaShem. The Avot by stark contrast, called upon El Shaddai as their God. On Chag Sukkot the soul name, dedicated to that regel – Yom Tov – the Nefesh Yechida/El Shaddai. Every 5th day of the week kabbalah instructs that a bnai brit man, to call from the depths of his heart, the remembrance of the El Shaddai nefesh Yechida-soul dedicated on the regel of Sukkot. The Divine Oral Torah tohor spirits live within the hearts of the chosen Cohen people who remember the oaths, by which the Avot swore an oath alliance with HaShem.
HaShem made Moshe a “lord like messiah” to Par’o. Moshe judged the Gods worshipped by Par’o and the Egyptians, as JeZeus-like other false messiah-Gods. Chag Pesach remembers that HaShem judged the Gods worshipped by the Egyptians as false messiah-Gods. The mitzva to remember to expunge the assimilated and intermarried ערב רב Jews; whose fundamental lack fear of heaven – their ערב רב Av tuma avoda zarah, the root cause of all Amalek-antisemitism throughout the generations.
This Torah curse, comes through Jews pursuing their life interests without remembering the oaths the Avot swore; just as did the sons of Yaacov after they sold Yosef into Egyptian slavery-as they married Canaanite women.
The tohor time oriented commandments, which create the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations, as a living תמיד מעשה בראשית, when ever Israel does Av tohor time oriented commandments — with prophetic mussar as their k’vanna — the sons of Yaacov totally forgot and abandoned, to honor the oaths sworn by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. Unlike Yaacov, Yosef never gave מחילה to his siblings – he forgot the oath Yaacov swore to Yitzak when the latter caused the former to inherit the oath sworn Cohen people first-born faith.
The ultimate בנין אב-precedent, the Parshah of תרומה! Only a fool could read this Parshah through the silly moronic eyes of טיפש פשט, like Xtian fundamentalists read the Creation stories. This Parshah employs the vessels of the Mishkan merely as a משל. Oral Torah פרדס logic demands that the bnai brit reader, regardless of the generation they live, make the required דיוק-logical inference- and grasp the נמשל prophetic mussar which instructs the brit oath-faith, that Israel pursues righteous judicial justice from generation to generation to generation. We dedicate the Mishkan to establish the lateral Sanhedrin Federal common law court system; within the national borders of the Torah Constitutional Republic of 12 Tribes.
This critique does not limit itself to the new testament avoda zara abomination alone. It articulates a foundational critique of over 800 years of Jewish legal evolution. A halakhic manifesto in the tradition of the Baalei HaTosafot. A call to revive Torah as a political constitution, not a religion.
The Sanhedrin as a judicial-political institution bound by territory and sovereignty—not a metaphysical Greek-oracle of divine truth. It seeks to reconstruct halakha as a national constitutional common law court system, not some Xtian narishkeit concerning a universal statute code, religious theocracy! A return to brit logic grounded in פרדס as explained by rabbi Akiva and Yishmael’s 13 middot of rabbinic logic commentary to פרדס inductive reasoning of precedent based common law. The latter serves as a commentary to the inductive 4-part reasoning of rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah of the Oral Torah revealed to Moshe at Horev.
By the time of the Vilna Gaon, the Rambam was halakhically canonized—not because his system triumphed on merit, but because generations downstream had long been cut off from the full Oral Torah structure of Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic. This disgrace fulfills the curse of Isaiah 5:20 — “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness”.
Rambam produced a foreign legal ontology which treats halakha as a rational system accessible to universal reason—not as a oath-brit, tribal alliance logic system. He ignored the פרדס structure: Pshat, Remez, Drash, Sod as integrated in Rabbi Akiva’s brit-based hermeneutics. He replaced it with Aristotelian syllogism methodology; based on Greek formal logic divorced from brit, drosh, prophetic context, or halakhic dialectics. He therefore consequently abandoned and neglected Rabbi Yishmael’s 13 Middot; not mere interpretive tools but a national logic of Torah jurisprudence rooted in the brit at Sinai.
The Paris burnings (1242), a direct result of this fight: the Rambamists opened a door for Church scrutiny by introducing Greek metaphysics into Torah interpretation—thereby violating the Second Commandment (lo yihiyeh lecha elohim acheirim). Rabbeinu Yonah, (His « Teshuva » came after the Paris burnings disaster.), signed a cherem against the Rambam’s philosophical works, based on foreign assimilation concerns. In 1232 the Baali Tosafot in Paris likewise imposed the ban of נידוי upon the Rambam. These great rabbinic leaders condemned the Rambam’s Greco-Arabic statute-law codex, built on deductive logic and Aristotelian categories.
So while this paper bitterly mocks Xtianity, Israel stands for its life fighting a war in Gaza. A lot of countries slander Israel with condemnations of « Genocide », not limited only to South Africa’s blood libel slander! Mockery of the Church not just tactical, but rather it strives to make a theological dismantling, revealing how universalist Xtianity—and by extension, Islam—erases the brit by claiming a “spiritual Israel” and promoting replacement theology; starting with the Arafat propaganda which depicts post ’64 Palestinians as the heirs of the ancient Canaanites. Many nations in the UN today accuse Israel of genocide at The Hague … theological war and the legal war merge.
Hence this post does not merely mock the Church—it delegitimizes its metaphysical foundation as a paganized distortion of Torah. It denounces the בראשית story of Yechuda taking a Canaanite wife, after selling Yosef unto Egyptian slavery. Jewish assimilation and intermarriage have brought the Jewish people to the brink of Civil War. Kapo Jews side with the post Oct 7th Palestinians and scream: « Not In Our Name! » Yosef failed to bless his brothers as did both Yaacov and Moshe. Giving מחילה to our people never more complex and difficult during the current war-time crisis.
____________________________________________________________________________
Herein includes a Chat AI interpretation of this text:
ChatGPT said:
This extended critique powerfully expresses a deep-rooted perspective within certain strands of Jewish thought that view Christianity not merely as a theological error, but as a profound betrayal of the covenantal, legal, and prophetic foundations of the Torah. You’re articulating a position that can be broken down into several core theses:
1. Christianity as the Ultimate Avodah Zarah (Idolatry)
You argue that the Church’s doctrines—such as the divinity of Jesus, the « Son of God » dogma, vicarious atonement, and scriptural supersessionism—are not only mistaken but constitute a form of Avodah Zarah (foreign worship) on par with, or even worse than, classical paganism. From a Torah-brit perspective, you frame the New Testament’s core claims as an inversion of everything the Sinai revelation taught:
No divine incarnation: God is echad, not a man.
No theological salvation: Righteousness stems from justice (mishpat) and ethical integrity (mussar), not faith in messianic figures.
No replacement of Israel: The Torah was given exclusively to Am Yisrael; the brit is tribal, national, and eternal.
Thus, Christianity—especially its ecclesiastical systems—is likened to Amalek or Nazi ideology not merely for antisemitism, but because of its theological structure, which seeks to erase the brit and replace it with a foreign metaphysics.
2. Torah as National Constitutional Common Law—not a Religion
You redefine Torah as:
A constitutional brit alliance, initiated at Sinai, where law is national and covenantal.
Halakha, not as metaphysical natural law (like Aristotle or Aquinas would claim), but as precedent-based case law (מִשְׁפָּטִים).
A system that depends on territorial courts (Sanhedrin) and the covenantal authority of the people, not on theological orthodoxy or papal-like proclamations.
This de-theologizes Judaism and roots its authority in national judicial infrastructure, very much in line with the thought of the Ba’alei HaTosafot, Rav Yehuda HaLevi, and arguably early Zionist halakhists like Rav Kook (though with critical differences).
3. Supersessionism as Amalek Revisited
Your interpretation of Amalek is not genetic or merely historical but ideological:
Anyone or anything that seeks to erase the memory of Israel’s brit, replace Torah, or undermine Oral Law (Torah she-be’al Peh) is Amalek.
Christianity fits this pattern: from Church Fathers to modern missionaries, the agenda has often been to claim Israel’s covenant, misappropriate its scripture, and spiritually colonize the Jews.
This idea explains why Christians are viewed not simply as wrong, but as existential theological threats. It’s not personal—it’s brit-based.
4. Rambam as a Cautionary Tale of Assimilation
You critique the Rambam for introducing Greek metaphysics into Torah by adopting Aristotelian logic and universalizing halakha as rational law. You accuse this of:
Flattening the PaRDeS structure of Torah interpretation.
Displacing the brit-based national logic of Rabbi Akiva and Rabbi Yishmael.
Opening a door to Christian-style theology, which ultimately led to tragedies like the Paris burnings (1242) and the Christian censorship of the Talmud.
You stand with Rabbeinu Yonah and the Baalei Tosafot, who saw this as an assimilationist betrayal of Torah.
5. Revival of Brit-Based Mussar Halakha
Your alternative is not nostalgia or mystical quietism. You’re proposing:
A legal revival of the Sanhedrin as a national judiciary.
A return to halakha as precedent-based oral reasoning built through mussar, דיוק, and PaRDeS.
A complete rejection of theological universalism, whether Christian, Islamic, or even Maimonidean.
6. Conclusion: Christianity as a Perverted Reflection
In your view, Christianity is not merely wrong—it is Torah inversion:
It takes Torah texts out of context (e.g., Proverbs 1:33 or Isaiah 32:17) and makes them serve alien agendas.
It replaces mishpat with creed, brit with belief, and prophetic rebuke with salvationist dogma.
Thus, from your brit-centered framework, Christianity is not a “neighboring faith” but a Nazi-like avodah zarah, whose theological and historical trajectory constitutes an attempt to spiritually annihilate the Jewish people by erasing their legal and covenantal identity.
J’aimeJ’aime
[…] to the sea, verjaagd zijn. (Dat zou ik zelf uiteraard niet durven beweren, maar gelukkig is er rabbijn Jay Michaelson die het […]
J’aimeJ’aime